Local Deploy First
In today’s cloud-dominated development landscape, many teams rely heavily on integrated platforms like Supabase, AWS, and Vercel to accelerate deployment. While convenient, this approach introduces risks such as vendor lock-in, reduced control over data, and long-term cost unpredictability.
For systems like OPC—where stability, security, and full ownership are critical—it is both practical and strategic to build a fully self-controlled technology stack, minimizing dependency on third-party cloud providers.
1. Core Principle: Control Over Convenience
The foundation of this architecture is simple:
- Own your data
- Avoid vendor lock-in
- Ensure infrastructure portability
- Maintain offline-capable core services (especially AI)
This mindset prioritizes long-term sustainability over short-term speed.
2. Database Layer: Self-Hosted PostgreSQL (No Supabase)
Instead of relying on managed solutions like Supabase, deploy a self-hosted PostgreSQL instance.
Why:
- Full control over data storage and backups
- No dependency on third-party APIs
- Flexible tuning for performance and scaling
Recommended Setup:
Run PostgreSQL via Docker or on bare metal
Enable replication for redundancy
Use tools like:
- pgBackRest (backups)
- Patroni (high availability)
- pgBouncer (connection pooling)
3. Compute Infrastructure: OVH Dedicated Servers (No AWS)
Avoid hyperscalers like AWS and instead use dedicated servers from OVHcloud.
Why:
- Predictable fixed pricing
- Full hardware control
- Consistent performance
Recommended Setup:
- 1 server for database
- 1+ servers for applications
- Optional GPU server for AI
Use:
- Proxmox / KVM for virtualization
- Docker (optionally Kubernetes) for orchestration
4. CDN & Edge Layer: Cloudflare (No Vercel)
For global delivery, use Cloudflare instead of Vercel.
Why:
- Global CDN with strong caching
- Built-in DDoS protection
- Integrated DNS, SSL, and WAF
Recommended Usage:
- Cache static assets
- Use Workers for edge logic
- Enable WAF and rate limiting
5. LLM Layer: Local Deployment (Gemma)
Instead of external APIs, deploy local LLMs using Gemma.
Why:
- Full data privacy
- No per-token costs
- Offline capability
Recommended Stack:
- Runtime: llama.cpp or vLLM
- Hardware: GPU preferred
- Optional: FAISS for RAG
6. Deployment & Automation: Dokploy
To simplify operations while maintaining full control, use Dokploy for deployment automation.
Why:
- Self-hosted alternative to platforms like Vercel or Heroku
- Git-based CI/CD pipelines
- Native Docker integration
- Simple UI for managing services
Recommended Workflow:
Connect your Git repositories to Dokploy
Define services (PostgreSQL, backend, frontend, LLM) via Docker
Automate:
- Build
- Deployment
- Rollbacks
Benefits:
- Eliminates manual SSH deployments
- Keeps full control (runs on your own OVH server)
- Provides “platform-like” experience without vendor lock-in
7. Networking & Observability
WireGuard for secure internal networking
Firewall + SSH key-only access
Monitoring:
- Prometheus + Grafana
- Loki / ELK for logs
8. Trade-offs
Pros:
- Full control
- Predictable cost
- No vendor lock-in
Cons:
- Higher DevOps complexity
- Requires in-house expertise
- Slightly more setup compared to SaaS
9. Cost Comparison: Self-Hosted vs Cloud
Self-Hosted (OVH)
Using OVHcloud:
Cost: ~$10–$20/month
Specs:
- Up to 64 GB RAM
- Dedicated CPU & storage
👉 Everything included: DB, backend, deployment (Dokploy), and even AI workloads (depending on hardware)
Cloud Equivalent (AWS-style)
Using Amazon Web Services:
| Component | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|
| RDS (Postgres) | $300–$800 |
| EC2 (Compute) | $200–$600 |
| CDN / Edge | $50–$200+ |
| LLM API | $100–$1000+ |
| Deployment (CI/CD tools) | $0–$100+ |
| Total | $650–$2700+ |
10. Final Takeaway
- Self-hosted: ~$10–$20/month
- Cloud: ~$650–$2700+/month
👉 30x–100x cost difference
By combining:
- PostgreSQL (self-hosted)
- OVHcloud infrastructure
- Cloudflare for edge
- Local LLMs like Gemma
- Automated deployment via Dokploy
…you achieve a system that is:
- Fully sovereign
- Cost-efficient
- Automated yet controlled
- Independent from hyperscale cloud vendors
This is not just an alternative architecture—it is a deliberate shift toward engineering ownership and long-term resilience.